As much of the aviation industry fights to survive the coronavirus pandemic, some economists and engineers see the crisis as an opportunity to use stimulus funds to propel air travel to a carbon-neutral future. Photo illustration: George Downs
More from the Wall Street Journal:
Visit WSJ.com:
Visit the WSJ Video Center:
On Facebook:
On Twitter:
On Snapchat:
#WSJ #Aviation #Science
Use code DANIEL213 for 100 free tickets! Limited time only. YOTTA high interest rate banking.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.withyotta.yotta
Hi guys,
check the 3rd part of #plandemic series for #COVID_19
0:19
school-teens.online
Guillotine ALL politicians.
On our planet hydrogen is not an energy source.
It would be mind-blowing if those electric concept aircraft comes to market 😎😎
Energy density lol can you beat jp7. Hydrogen can come close.
The argument that hydrogen has to be sythesized from polluting fossil fuel and is projected to be more expensive than kerosene is just flat wrong. Proton Technologies in Alberta Canada is already taking it out of the ground from old oil wells while leaving the carbon behind, for cheaper than kerosene. See for yourself: https://youtu.be/-rwIDpT1O4U
Here's how it works: https://youtu.be/8MU3BoEt-FM
Track hydrogen in Canada here: https://www.ontheground.net/archive/hydrogen
All fiction and unsecentific! What school other than government schools do these people come from? “Withholding information is the essence of tyranny. Control of the flow of information is the tool of the dictatorship.” Bruce Coville
so basically wishful thinking at this point, joe scott did a video on this i believe and his main point was that in the near future we'll still be using kerosene because nothing can trump its energy density.
I hope governments do this put conditions but i understand why they dont its because the pandemic forced the government to put restrictions on the industries it wasnt anyone fault like the great recession so the funds are to compensate rather than to bail out
I imagine the engineers claiming this is a good idea as being held at gunpoint by some economist otherwise equally wonkish academic.
We must stop the climate catastrophism Mafia!!!!! Human-caused temperature increase is a FRAUD!!!!!. CO2 (the gas of LIFE AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS) IS GOOD, VERY GOOD. POLLUTION IS BAD.
World scientists sign and send letter to the U.N. warning about this fraud:
https://clintel.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Guus-Berkhout_essay-2020_V4-def.pdf
https://clintel.nl/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/ecd-letter-to-un.pdf
Italian scientists sign a petition to their government warning about this fraud:
https://notrickszone.com/2019/07/04/90-leading-italian-scientists-sign-petition-co2-impact-on-climate-unjustifiably-exaggerated-catastrophic-predictions-not-realistic/
World scientists made earlier petition about this massive fraud:
http://www.petitionproject.org https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions
http://www.populartechnology.net/2014/12/all-97-consensus-studies-refuted-by.html
Statements by IPCC experts against the IPCC:
https://climatism.blog/2020/03/07/46-statements-by-ipcc-experts-against-the-ipcc/
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324599511_Thermal_Enhancement_on_Planetary_Bodies_and_the_Relevance_of_the_Molar_Mass_Version_of_the_Ideal_Gas_Law_to_the_Null_Hypothesis_of_Climate_Change
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TNbxIdU4mEsEcxuPNoPllAchyg2FktR-/view?usp=drivesdk
https://youtu.be/kLmD1n044oc https://youtu.be/YYsjhz7DT1s
We must go full nuclear!. The safest, I repeat, the safest, cheaper, cleanest, and the least landscape intrusive energy. And non intermittent, by the way. Should not were for the taxes imposed by stupid or corrupt governments on the taxpayers for the subsidies for solar and wind, they wouldn't exist. It's a big scam for the hard-earned-money workers. STOP THE WIND AND SOLAR CRAZINESS:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=18BREkXwKO3I5kWbaVq36c7JK6NxJAtGr
https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/06/wind-energy-subsidies-billions/
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/06/opinion/sunday/climate-change-nuclear-power.html
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/the-curious-wavefunction/nuclear-power-may-have-saved-1-8-million-lives-otherwise-lost-to-fossil-fuels-may-save-up-to-7-million-more/
https://ourworldindata.org/what-is-the-safest-form-of-energy
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/death-rates-from-energy-production-per-twh
https://www.politico.eu/article/germanys-green-dreams-run-into-climate-change-reality-nuclear/
https://grist.org/article/its-time-to-go-nuclear-in-the-fight-against-climate-change/
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/601533/nuclear-shutdowns-could-ramp-up-us-carbon-emissions/
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/01/27/germany-totally-kills-coal-will-likely-end-up-in-the-dark-without-heat-and-light/
https://unearthed.greenpeace.org/2019/03/28/china-new-coal-plants-2030-climate/
https://www.nei.org/advantages
https://humanevents.com/2014/03/24/the-carbon-dioxide-level-is-dangerously-low/
CO2 is very GOOD (look at the increase in crops worldwide in recent years: http://www.fao.org/worldfoodsituation/csdb/en/ ). Pollution is BAD.
Has global warming already arrived?
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364682618305030#bib1a
http://www.plateclimatology.com/discovery-of-massive-volcanic-co2-emissions-puts-damper-on-global-warming-theory
The Earth is getting greener because of CO2:
https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/global_tamo_2017_full.png
https://realclimatescience.com/2019/07/extreme-fraud-by-the-union-of-concerned-scientists/
https://notrickszone.com/
If the carbon dioxide is so bad for the climate, how is it explained that during the years 1934 to 1937 such great natural disasters (heat waves, enormous floodings of 1927,…..) occurred in the USA with half the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere of which we have nowadays?.
0:28
dirk-girl.com