Home / Sports / Green Aviation: Why the Pandemic May Spur Carbon-Neutral Flight | WSJ

Green Aviation: Why the Pandemic May Spur Carbon-Neutral Flight | WSJ

As much of the aviation industry fights to survive the coronavirus pandemic, some economists and engineers see the crisis as an opportunity to use stimulus funds to propel air travel to a carbon-neutral future. Photo illustration: George Downs

More from the Wall Street Journal:
Visit WSJ.com:
Visit the WSJ Video Center:

On Facebook:
On Twitter:
On Snapchat:

#WSJ #Aviation #Science

About News Update


Check Also

'It's instinct': Premier League managers sceptical of socially distanced celebrations

Premier League managers have expressed scepticism at the idea of socially distanced goal celebrations, after …


  1. Avatar

    Use code DANIEL213 for 100 free tickets! Limited time only. YOTTA high interest rate banking.

  2. Avatar
    Cultural quotes - مقتطفات ثقافية

    Hi guys,
    check the 3rd part of #plandemic series for #COVID_19

  3. Avatar
    Анна Михайлюта


  4. Avatar

    Guillotine ALL politicians.

  5. Avatar

    On our planet hydrogen is not an energy source.

  6. Avatar

    It would be mind-blowing if those electric concept aircraft comes to market 😎😎

  7. Avatar
    Kevin Yau Chee Kin

    Energy density lol can you beat jp7. Hydrogen can come close.

  8. Avatar

    The argument that hydrogen has to be sythesized from polluting fossil fuel and is projected to be more expensive than kerosene is just flat wrong. Proton Technologies in Alberta Canada is already taking it out of the ground from old oil wells while leaving the carbon behind, for cheaper than kerosene. See for yourself: https://youtu.be/-rwIDpT1O4U

    Here's how it works: https://youtu.be/8MU3BoEt-FM

    Track hydrogen in Canada here: https://www.ontheground.net/archive/hydrogen

  9. Avatar

    All fiction and unsecentific! What school other than government schools do these people come from? “Withholding information is the essence of tyranny. Control of the flow of information is the tool of the dictatorship.” Bruce Coville

  10. Avatar

    so basically wishful thinking at this point, joe scott did a video on this i believe and his main point was that in the near future we'll still be using kerosene because nothing can trump its energy density.

  11. Avatar

    I hope governments do this put conditions but i understand why they dont its because the pandemic forced the government to put restrictions on the industries it wasnt anyone fault like the great recession so the funds are to compensate rather than to bail out

  12. Avatar

    I imagine the engineers claiming this is a good idea as being held at gunpoint by some economist otherwise equally wonkish academic.

  13. Avatar

    We must stop the climate catastrophism Mafia!!!!! Human-caused temperature increase is a FRAUD!!!!!. CO2 (the gas of LIFE AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS) IS GOOD, VERY GOOD. POLLUTION IS BAD.

    World scientists sign and send letter to the U.N. warning about this fraud:



    Italian scientists sign a petition to their government warning about this fraud:


    World scientists made earlier petition about this massive fraud:
    http://www.petitionproject.org https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions


    Statements by IPCC experts against the IPCC:



    https://youtu.be/kLmD1n044oc https://youtu.be/YYsjhz7DT1s

  14. Avatar

    We must go full nuclear!. The safest, I repeat, the safest, cheaper, cleanest, and the least landscape intrusive energy. And non intermittent, by the way. Should not were for the taxes imposed by stupid or corrupt governments on the taxpayers for the subsidies for solar and wind, they wouldn't exist. It's a big scam for the hard-earned-money workers. STOP THE WIND AND SOLAR CRAZINESS:


    CO2 is very GOOD (look at the increase in crops worldwide in recent years: http://www.fao.org/worldfoodsituation/csdb/en/ ). Pollution is BAD.

    Has global warming already arrived?


    The Earth is getting greener because of CO2:



    If the carbon dioxide is so bad for the climate, how is it explained that during the years 1934 to 1937 such great natural disasters (heat waves, enormous floodings of 1927,…..) occurred in the USA with half the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere of which we have nowadays?.

  15. Avatar
    Борис Бутафоров


Leave a Reply